Note: This is my third mailout which was taken to the post office yesterday. I got such a great response from the second mailout that I am sending that mailout with ADDED information. Please read about Esparza's campaign report, and his secretary's brother Alberto Ocegueda not being prosecuted for child molestation allegations. Ocegueda is a teacher in the Socorro school district.

January 28, 2008

Dear fellow El Pasoans,

This is the second letter I have sent to dedicated voters. My name is Theresa Caballero and I am seeking the office of District Attorney for the 34th Judicial District in the March 4, 2008 democratic primary. I introduced myself to you in my first mailing on January 4, 2008 where you read about my credentials and some of the issues involved in this race. If you did not receive that letter, please visit my website, TC4DA.COM, where you will find it posted on January 4, 2008 in its entirety.

In that letter, I told you that I would explain why Dionicio Flores, editor of the El Paso Times, the only English Language daily newspaper in El Paso would use his monopolistic power to run a smear campaign against me and thereby try and influence you not to vote for me. Keep in mind that Dionicio Flores actually told you he was going to do this when he wrote in a November 2007 editorial that my campaign would be “grist” for future editorials. Since print media can wield tremendous influence, especially when it remains unchallenged, I take Mr. Flores at his word. It is for this reason that I write you this letter. I will not take the Times’ onslaught lying down, anymore than I would defer to any powerful interest as your District Attorney.

So now I pose a simple question to you: why would Mr. Flores be so rattled by me, a person he has never met and a person whose work in the courtroom as a lawyer he has never seen? What does he actually know of me? That I have fought against unwarranted higher taxes, I have fought for the rights of the taxpayer, I have fought against corrupt government and I have an impeccable record as a trial attorney. Why then would Mr. Flores be so emotional and vitriolic regarding a private citizen who has never previously run for or held public office? What have I done to engender such hostility? My honesty is regarded so highly that I was asked to help author the ethics code for the County of El Paso. I am an attorney honorable enough to appear in Federal Court, State Court and Military Courts-Martial. How then to make sense of Mr. Flores’ animosity? I write you this letter to explain. Just as they say never judge a book by its cover, as you will see, never judge the Times by what you read and mistake it for news. It is only spin, plain and simple; spin intended to further personal agendas rather than what it should rightfully be: unbiased reporting intended to inform.

Keep in mind that once upon a time, years before I announced my own race for District Attorney, Mr. Flores used his pages to comment on the different scandals my opponent Jaime Esparza created. Mr. Flores now apparently hopes his readers would think so little of what he once published that they have long forgotten. I had provided these articles in their entirety on my website, TC4DA.COM. The El Paso Times received full credit and attribution. Nevertheless, within mere days the lawyer for the El Paso Times demanded that I remove them. Mr. Flores, whose paper suffers from embarrassingly low circulation, for some reason did not want anyone to see what he had once written about my opponent. Why would a news outlet which purports to be proud of its publications not want greater exposure? What kind of newspaper editor first tells his readers that the current District Attorney Esparza abused his power, trampled on the first amendment, and wrongfully prosecuted the innocent, and now seeks to praise this same DA? Why would Mr. Flores try to destroy my candidacy when I represent positive change for El Paso? Why would he intend to sabotage my campaign when I only seek to expose exactly the kinds of transgressions he and the Times itself published about my opponent? Transgressions the likes of which persist to this very day? Let’s take a walk down memory lane. Let’s listen to Mr. Flores in his own newspaper’s words:

8-22-00, El Paso Times editorial sub-titled Police, DA Must be Held Accountable
“El Paso’s police and District Attorney want to abridge your first amendment rights by muzzling the media and by silencing and intimidating sourcesWhat the police and DA are doing is a blatant attempt to muzzle the media to protect themselves at the expense of freedom of information, and with the very real danger of not investigating what needs to be investigated.”

8-24-00, El Paso Times editorial titled Justice Delayed
“This week it was revealed that the investigation of media leaks in the police department is not a search for the truth but a district attorney witch hunt fraught with spite, vengeance and senseless foot-draggingWhat a pathetic display of law enforcement or lack thereofEsparza’s intransigence is reprehensible.”

9-20-00, El Paso Times editorial sub-titled Esparza should turn his zeal toward real crime
“Picture District Attorney Jaime Esparza dressed as Don Quixote, a death grip on his prosecutorial lance, charging furiously at a windmill whose paddles are labeled George DeAngelis, Cerjio Martinez, El Paso Times, Channel 7, Larry Francis.

That’s the clownish level to which Esparza has sunk in his unhealthily obsessive pursuit of who leaked internal police documents to the Times and Channel 7-KVIA in June. Esparza and the DA’s office have been fixated with this crusade for an incredible 13 weeks. What an unnecessary waste of time and money for both taxpayers and those targeted by the investigation.

But it’s not nearly over. Now, desperately flailing about in his all-consuming attempt to trample the First Amendment underfoot, Esparza is ...

An attorney called Francis [former mayor, Larry Francis] in the spring about two police officers-one of them DeAngelis -- who were concerned about alleged improprieties in the police department and wanted advice about what to do.

It’s significant that they didn’t feel comfortable going to the department’s Internal Affairs Division, or to Esparza...

...and it deserves a thorough investigation, possibly by a special prosecutor, certainly not a local rubber-stamper.

Now the question is, who’s next on Esparza’s hit list?...

Imagine how El Paso would benefit if Esparza, rather than spending his time and effort trying to subvert freedom of speech...turned that zeal toward the prosecution of real crime.”

9-24-00, El Paso Times editorial titled Intimidation intensifies and subtitled Esparza is making whistleblowers think twice
“One of the most frightening aspects of the El Paso district attorney’s investigation of leaks of public information to the media is the chilling effect it already is having on whistle-blowers.

Whistle-blowers are employees who report fraud or misconduct by officials and companies, public and private. We need whistle-blowers...

But you’d never know that from the way District Attorney Jaime Esparza and a grand jury have targeted people who were simply trying to do the right thing: report problems in the police department so that they could be corrected...

The bad news is that, because Esparza is focusing more on punishing whistle-blowers than on uncovering misconduct or mismanagement in the police department, it may be a long time before anyone speaks up again. What a shame...

That’s a disservice to the Police Department, it’s a damaging blow to the spirit of public service, and it’s an insult to every El Pasoan.”


I have previously questioned where DA Jaime Esparza has been regarding the current, rampant public corruption that has unfolded on his watch. You have just read the El Paso Times commentaries regarding Esparza’s treatment of corruption charges on an earlier occasion. His past proves to be an indicator of his present, and our potentially dangerous future. When two high ranking police officers, one the deputy police chief, second in command only to the chief, came forward to blow the whistle on a possible drug cartel infiltration at our police department, Esparza did not pursue an investigation. Instead, he relentlessly hunted down the two officers who made the complaint and actually had them arrested and indicted. No wonder the FBI has had to investigate local corruption. Esparza made clear long ago that he will not. Worse. Woe to citizens, even police officers, who dare to speak out – the taxpayer had to pay George DeAngelis $250,000 in the end for the wrong done to him.

And woe to our pocketbooks. Amazingly, it’s not just tolerance of corruption but possible malfeasance of monumental proportions that also afflicts Esparza’s office. As recently as October 13, 2007 in an article entitled Feds say they paid county too much, the Times reported:

“The Department of Justice has asked El Paso County officials [Jaime Esparza] to explain, document or justify claiming $3.9 million extra in reimbursements from the government for prosecuting federally referred criminal cases...

A September audit report by the Department’s Office of Inspector General, ...states the district [Jaime Esparza] and county attorney’s offices repeatedly sought and received too much reimbursement from the federal program...

The audit contends the county should have been paid $11.8 million since 2002, not the $13.5 million that was paid...”


This short, convoluted article written by David Crowder—the same David Crowder who Esparza not so coincidentally released on a DWI charge last year--tells us that the Justice Department believes Esparza has over-billed the federal government to the tune of millions of dollars and is now investigating Esparza’s office. In a city where the press performs its job and watches over all public officials, this would be front page, large font, headline news. The DA has a job to do and a budget within which to do it. Our sitting DA not only doesn’t do his job; he even charges extra for not doing it. And the El Paso Times? It merely whispers about it and lets it drop. The Times has yet to write one follow-up on this latest scandal. You can be sure that when the Feds want their money back from Jaime Esparza who they say possibly over-billed them, you, the El Paso taxpayer, will pay and go on paying for the millions overspent and owed. And you can be sure that Flores at the Times won’t mention that either.

All this is happening against the backdrop of a nationally reported public corruption investigation into local El Paso politicians by the FBI. Esparza cannot answer for his failure to investigate let alone prosecute these corrupt officials who now admit they were selling their votes at our expense. He cannot answer why he didn’t notice rampant corruption even when some of it was occurring just one floor above him at the courthouse. He cannot answer why he, as the chief prosecutor for the state of Texas in El Paso, didn’t notice stealing at high levels when the average El Pasoan has known about it for years. The FBI investigation and the federal prosecutions of these corrupt elected officials are a stinging indictment of Esparza’s refusal to prosecute the corrupt. Had Esparza done his job, the Feds wouldn’t have to do it for us.

As you have read from the Times itself, before I ever entered the scene, Mr. Flores had accused Esparza of not upholding his oath to protect the Constitution, specifically the right to free speech; for prosecuting whistle-blowers; for misusing taxpayer money; for having a hit list; for using the grand jury as a weapon. But now the Times has changed with the times. Now Mr. Flores does not mention Esparza’s failure to act on our behalf and now he gives scant coverage to an investigation into Esparza’s multi-million dollar possible over billing. Things don’t get much worse for an incumbent. And yet Mr. Flores still writes that I, the candidate seeking genuine reform and the restoration of honesty to the DA’s office, am “grist” for future editorials. Again: why? Consider the following:

In May 2005, I appeared before City Council, as a private citizen, taxpayer and homeowner, to complain about property valuations by the Central Appraisal District. I explained to City Council that El Pasoans needed an investigation into CAD for its selective and uneven appraisals. Some people have high appraisals while others do not. I used the example of Dionicio Flores’ home. I explained before council, the public, public access TV and other media including the Times and El Diario of El Paso that Mr. Flores had purchased his home in the early 1990’s in the upscale neighborhood The Willows and that since then his evaluations had hardly moved while the rest of us had been hit hard. I implored council on behalf of the abused taxpayer to look into the CAD because obviously the El Paso Times would not. Not unless Mr. Flores its editor wished to publicly reveal his own valuations.

Only the Diario reporter was interested in the story. On May 23, 2005, the Diario ran a front page article that featured the gross inequities of CAD, highlighting Mr. Flores’ appraisals vis-à-vis his neighbors’ to illustrate the point. The Diario published that in 1993, CAD listed Flores’ home at $230,400. In 2004, CAD listed the same home, still owned by Flores, at $225,418. According to the Diario figures, Flores’ home valuation had DECREASED by 2.2%. According to the Diario article, the average home value in El Paso during the same time period had INCREASED by 47%. When the Diario called Flores for comment on what criteria the CAD uses to increase property valuations by 47% in the last 11 years while in exclusive sectors of the city, valuations went down, Flores was quoted as saying, “I don’t knowI don’t know about that” When asked about his own home he said, “I don’t know how much it costs (the house) or how much it cost in 1993.” Flores’ frustrated response, “I don’t know why you are calling me, nor do I know with whom I am speaking and I don’t have to talk about this with you” was also published in the Diario article. To this day, to my knowledge, there has yet to be an article in the El Paso Times regarding the vast disparities of property valuations coming from CAD. And in the interim? The Diario recently reported that 400 El Paso families each month lose their homes and are living in them up to the day they are evicted. High property taxes no doubt play a factor for those living paycheck to paycheck. Also in the interim, just a short two years since my presentation before council on Flores’ property and the subsequent Diario article, Mr. Flores’ home evaluation shot up to $319,152. Did I cost Mr. Flores some money? Is that why he says I will be “grist” for future editorials?

In July 2006, El Paso Times reporter David Crowder (the same reporter who was in council chambers the day I exposed the CAD and Mr. Flores’ property evaluations) was arrested by the El Paso Police for DWI. Yet when Crowder was taken into custody and his DWI case presented for prosecution, Esparza refused to prosecute the case. Despite police evidence, and the fact that this was Crowder’s SECOND arrest for DWI, Crowder, who Dionicio Flores considers his star reporter, was immediately released by Esparza. Flores well knows that Esparza’s decision to dismiss this case benefitted Crowder and therefore the Times. In this chummy agreement between press and public official, one can wonder that a favor on one side naturally incurs a debt on the other.

I exposed the Crowder episode on my website months ago since it shows so transparently how Esparza’s regime fails to apply the law equally when it comes to those in power. Crowder’s case is but one of many that exemplifies how Dionicio Flores and my opponent have created two El Pasos. One set of rules for the privileged and powerful and connected, another for the rest of us.

Recently, Flores has published several flattering articles lauding Esparza’s new DWI program to get drunken drivers off the streets. To call this shameless would be an understatement. Mr. Esparza’s record on the Crowder case alone speaks for itself. The rest of us still find ourselves sharing the road with drunk drivers who happen to have friends in high places. Can anyone believe the new DWI programs will ever apply to them?

Do you want a handful of wealthy Republicans determining who your DA should be? Ask yourself why Mr. Flores has not told you that Esparza’s campaign contribution list is a veritable “who’s who” of wealthy Republican donors. Over one-third of Esparza’s contributors come from the west side of El Paso, including the president of the Coronado Country Club. The list includes Woody Hunt, Paul Foster, Robert Brown, Gerry Rubin, Rick Francis, Douglas and Scott Schwartz, J.O. Stewart and Steve Fox. This wealthy group has given hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years to various Republicans and the Republican Party. They have been huge supporters of George W. Bush and have given massive sums of money to Republicans Rick Perry and Tom Craddick. Why do these Republicans care so much about the DA’s race and why are they getting behind a supposed Democratic candidate like my opponent? Could it be because my opponent panders to the elite monied-class for campaign funds? These funds afford Esparza $320 meals in Mexico City at the Maria Isabela Sheraton. He writes these meals off as campaign expenditures. Why is Esparza campaigning in Mexico City, or is he? We see that my opponent’s friends and allies are rewarded. One example of this favoritism is when the police caught former Mayor Joe Wardy at the airport with a loaded gun about to board a flight. The police called Esparza for instructions and Esparza informed them that he would not prosecute Wardy. The police immediately released Wardy. Carrying a gun in the secured area of an airport is a felony offense under Texas law. Esparza prosecutes citizens for this very same offense year after year. If you carried a loaded gun into security at the airport, do you think Esparza would let you go? Ask yourself why Mr. Flores kept publishing in his paper through the pen of David Crowder that Wardy’s case was a federal offense when in fact it is a State offense. Texas Penal Code Sec. 46.03 states, “A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly possesses or goes with a firearm...into a secured area of an airport.” Why did Flores remain silent about Esparza refusing to prosecute Wardy for a crime he has prosecuted other El Pasoans for? I exposed the Wardy case on my website. I also exposed Flores’ failure to inform his readers that Wardy’s case was a State offense and Esparza let him go.

Why did Flores not tell you that Esparza refused to prosecute local Socorro school district coach Alberto Ocegueda on child molestation allegations? In 2006, a judge ordered the arrest of Mr. Ocegueda for allegedly molesting a six year old girl at Lujan Chavez Elementary. (See links below for a copy of the complaint affidavit signed by the judge). Esparza refused to prosecute Ocegueda. Ocegueda happens to be the brother of Esparza’s personal secretary, Amy Ocegueda Lujan. Amy Ocegueda Lujan is the same secretary whom Esparza pays a salary of over $80,000 a year to. She earns more than many lawyers do in the DA’s office. Amy Ocegueda Lujan also travels to Mexico City on the taxpayer dime. What legitimate business could a secretary be doing on behalf of the residents of El Paso County in Mexico City? All of this is paid for by your tax money. This fall, more than 30 parents of children at Alberto Ocegueda’s new school held a demonstration. The angry and concerned parents gathered outside the school and protested against Ocegueda and Esparza. Mr. Flores did not write one article about the demonstration. Nor was there an article about the connection between Esparza and Ocegueda. I exposed on my website the Ocegueda case as well as Mr. Flores’ failure to inform you of its true facts. Ocegueda is a free man and still teaches in the Socorro school district.

Perhaps now you can discern why in November 2007, in the middle of my race, Mr. Flores told you that I will be “grist” for future editorials. I exposed the gross disparity between his personal property tax assessment and those of the rest of us. I exposed the special treatment his star reporter Crowder received at the hands of my opponent. I exposed Flores’ double speak regarding the sitting DA and the Ocegueda case. When the Times tries to spin, slam and smear me, remember this. Ask yourself what Flores could honestly say about me as a private citizen. And compare that with what he once honestly did say about Esparza’s misdeeds as DA: trampling on the constitution, misusing the grand jury, prosecuting whistleblowers, maintaining a hit list of enemies. Remember this as you write your check this month for your property taxes while at the same time you read about public officials selling their votes to impose bonds that result in just those higher property taxes. Ask yourself why Mr. Flores has not written about 400 El Paso families losing their homes every month partly due to exorbitant property taxes, clinging to their residences up to the day they’re evicted. Ask yourself why Mr. Flores has not once written of Esparza’s failure to prosecute corrupt officials that are now FBI targets or follow up on Esparza’s “possible over billing to the Feds.” Ask yourself how Flores, in light of all this, writes that I, a homeowner and candidate for DA seeking reform in a cesspool of corruption, am “grist” for future editorials.

As the Times sits down at length to interview my opponent, they will attack me for not doing the same. They may claim, as others have tried to do, that I am not granting fair media access. Nothing could be further from the truth. I would like nothing more than a fighting chance with a fair press. But when blatant bias becomes obvious, an honest candidate interviewing with the Times and its ilk would be like Daniel walking into the lion’s den. But make no mistake. This is no lion’s den. This is a pack of wolves. No. I will not be interviewing with the El Paso Times editorial board run by Dionicio Flores. I only seek endorsements from those qualified to endorse based on their record of impartiality and fairness. That is why I seek only your endorsement. You, the voter, control the final endorsement and it is only your endorsement I seek. Vote for me for DA on March 4 and by doing so tell Dionicio Flores at the Times and Jaime Esparza we’ve had enough of business as usual.

Our Constitution’s First Amendment is the most important and that is why it is first. It grants us as a people the right to free speech and freedom of religion, freedom of assembly and freedom of the press. Yet if a citizen does not have the right to speak out, then, logically, he cannot exercise any of the other rights that follow. How can you demand your rights if you cannot even state them? How can you fairly exercise your right to vote if the press does not properly inform you? How can democracy survive if those who exercise control over information mislead the electorate? How can you vote for Theresa Caballero for DA if you don’t even know she is running? How do you know what she believes if the media not only doesn’t tell you but vilifies her? The First Amendment may grant us freedom of speech, but when our voices are muzzled by a press that shirks its duties, when it has long ceased to be honest and fair, when it no longer functions as it should as the people’s watchdog on the government, then the First Amendment itself has been destroyed by the press, the very institution it was designed to protect. I have long believed that Mr. Flores, as the monopolistic manager of El Paso’s only English daily newspaper abdicated his responsibilities as a would-be journalist through his bitter bias that underscores his disdain not just for his opponents, but for the constitution we all revere.

We have suffered greatly because of this. I am not afraid to say so even when I know Mr. Flores will expend barrels of ink to suggest to you that I should not be your next DA. He would have you believe all is well in El Paso. That we live in America’s third safest city. I ask you: does El Paso feel safe to you? Does all seem well while corruption flourishes all around us? No matter what Flores at the Times spews, attacking me and complimenting my opponent, we cannot and need not endure another four corruption-laden years just because Mr. Flores pretends all is well. You now have a choice after sixteen long years of stagnation.

Please, stand up for me so that I can continue to stand up for you. I need your help at the polls on March 4, 2008. I also need your help as I face an inevitable onslaught from this well organized, well funded propaganda machine. I am fighting against entrenched interests whose coffers are bottomless. My own campaign is mostly self-funded. I ask for your vote for a better El Paso. I also ask for your financial help so I can best wage this battle against powerful forces. No amount is too small. Please, contribute whatever you can. You can send a check to the address at the bottom of this letter, or you can contribute on-line at TC4DA.COM. There you can also see for yourself what I truly believe, in my own words, unfiltered by Dionicio Flores. Read my numerous blogs on the many issues and please, provide your comments on this most critical election. Together, we can bring about the change El Paso needs and deserves.

Sincerely,




Theresa Caballero
TC4DA.com
300 East Main Street, Suite 1136
El Paso, Texas 79901
thcaballero@hotmail.com
915-241-8418

What follows are questions that the El Paso Times has submitted to me to answer for a story they say they are doing. Because I have been misquoted and vilified by the Times in the past and because Dionicio Flores, the editor, wrote in an editorial in November 2007, just three months ago, that my campaign would be "grist" for future editorials, I only deal with the Times in writing if I deal with them at all.

Here are the questions posed to me and my answers.

1) A year ago you told me if elected to office you would put an end to the "illegal system of DIMS." Is that still your plan and why do you think DIMS is illegal?

Answer: Doing away with DIMS will be my first act in office for the citizens of El Paso County. DIMS is illegal because the District Attorney has put himself in the place of the judge; my opponent sets bonds and makes arrest approval decisions. Setting bonds and making arrest approval determinations are the function of a judge and not the DA. Fifth graders know this. Under DIMS a person is jailed without seeing a judge and the DA sets the bond. DIMS is also illegal because it has created two legal systems in El Paso. According to my opponent's DIMS manual which he wrote himself the following persons are exempt from DIMS. I quote from the manual, "Non DIMS CASES: Cases involving employees of the District Attorney's Office. Cases that involve a public official." The public needs to know this. In this country there is one law and it is supposed to apply equally to everyone. My opponent treats people in power specially.

2) Campaign Contribution reports indicate your opponent has raised more money than you have. Do you think you are getting the financial support you need to run an effective campaign?

Answer: I have raised thousands of dollars which combined with my own resources have enabled me to get my message out through direct mailouts, a billboard, signs, cards, website and newspaper ads. I have spent my contributors' money honestly and wisely in getting my message out. My opponent has used his money to contribute to other politicians' campaigns (some of them targets of the FBI investigation) and to pay for $320 meals at fancy restaurants in Mexico City. It's all about how you spend your money. The fact that people know my name, that I am running for District Attorney and that I want to clean up this town shows me that I have been very effective. I have also used my own shoe leather to walk El Paso precincts all over town. I have many supporters who help me every day to get my message out. The debate I did on KVIA resulted in more people calling me to offer their support and help.

3) How do you think your campaign is going so far? What is your campaign platform?

Answer: My campaign is going very well and gaining more support every day. My campaign platform is to:

a) Restore the rule of law to the District Attorney's Office: One law for everyone. Get rid of DIMS.
b) Set up a special mental health unit to properly evaluate cases involving the mentally ill.
c) Set up a special financial crimes unit with accountants and lawyers with financial forensic expertise to investigate local public corruption at the taxing entities and entities like the Housing Authority.
d) Reform the corrupted grand jury process. House them in a neutral place, properly train grand juries and discontinue my opponent's policy of using the grand jury as a weapon and restricting the public's access to the grand jury.
e)Take citizen complaints directly from the public: Encourage citizen whistle-blowers to come forward and report corruption and crime.
f) Make it unneccessary for the federal government to have to step into local politics by investigating and prosecuting corruption myself as your next District Attorney.
g) Give the accused a fair trial and be even handed with the power vested in me by the public.
h)Convene a grand jury to investigate public corruption.

4)What do you think are the top three issues in this race?

Answer:
-DIMS and the erosion of the constitution and our checks and balances in the arrest process that my opponent has created and nurtured for years.

-Public corruption going unaddressed for years by my opponent.

-A properly trained DA staff to investigate and prosecute the crimes facing this community and destroying this community, i.e. public corruption and the fleecing of the taxpayers. The public needs to understand that public corruption simply means that our politicians are stealing our money by selling their votes to engorge their friends' pockets (voting to pass bonds and certificates of obligation on the public). This increases our already crushing tax burden which in turn is driving people out of El Paso and out of their homes.

Theresa Caballero

Last night on Channel 7-KVIA, Theresa Caballero won the first television debate against Esparza. If you missed it, don't despair as you can still view it on line in its entirety at KVIA.com. She not only looked more "prosecutorial" than he did but she also spoke better, told the truth and proved herself to be the much better candidate by far. It was obvious that Esparza has been in office way too long. His canned responses were laughable.

Esparza got caught not telling the truth to us about what the Federal courts said about DIMS. When Theresa pulled out the actual court opinion and read from the Federal court's Terrell opinion on live TV Esparza was shown to be not telling the truth on that point. He looked real bad when he kept saying look at page 10, look at page 10. After all, Theresa was reading the actual holding of the court in that case. He looked like he did not know what he was talking about. In comparison, Theresa looked well prepared and had the documentation with her to support her position like she always does. That is what you want in a lawyer and a District Attorney!

Gary Warner did an excellent job. His questions were knowledge-based and probing on the issues. Theresa did a great job as well. Her demeanor was very Madam District Attorney-like. She spoke well, knew all the issues, was never stumped for an answer like Esparza was. Esparza was choppy, defensive and evasive. He could not and did not answer Theresa's question about how in the world he could be cooperating with the Feds on the public corruption investigation (as he stated that he was at a forum last week) when he is both accepting and giving money to the major targets of that investigation within the last 14 month. Go read his campaign finance reports from the last few years. They are very telling as to who gives him money and who he gives his campaign money to and go a long way in explaining why HE did not do anything about public corruption in this county.

Esparza floundered around on why he did not know of or investigate the public corruption himself; he had excuse after excuse (none plausible) as to why he didn't. Theresa then pointed out that he must be either incompetent or people are afraid to report corruption to him because of his history of arresting whistle-blowers. She cited as only two examples former number two El Paso Police Officer George DeAngelis and Nancy Hollebeke, two people who reported corruption to him and who he then turned around and had arrested, indicted and prosecuted. The City ended up having to pay Mr. DeAngelis a nice, hefty sum of our taxpayer money to compensate him for what Esparza did to him. In the case of Ms. Hollebeke the last word in that case was Esparza's own attorney, The El Paso County Attorney's Office, admitting in a court document in the expunction case that Esparza set her up from the very beginning and that she should never have been arrested or charged in the first place.

Esparza claims to be proud of his 16 years in office. Experience only counts, however, if it works well for the community. After 16 years one would think Esparza would know how to try a case, get a conviction and make it stick. But, alas, that, too, is not the case because interestingly enough, and also on KVIA-7 last night at 10:00 p.m. was a story about the Capital Murder case of David Renteria. Gary Warner told us on the air, how the Court of Appeals threw out Renteria's conviction because Esparza himself (yes, he tried the case himself; he was the trial attorney) misled the jury and left them with a false impression. Shame on him. He should know better after 16 years! But he doesn't. Because of his misconduct the case has to be re-tried. This will cost the County of El Paso untold thousands of dollars in costs to re-try it and will cause the Flores family additional unecessary anguish as the issue is still unresolved. Also interestingly enough, Esparza is not even fixing his own mistake and re-trying the case himself but sending someone else in to re-try it for him. Theresa is an experienced former prosecutor and trial attorney, She knows how to try a case and make it stick. 16 years is more than enough of Esparza. It is high time for a change. He has fooled the people for 16 years and imposed this bad, terrible system of DIMS on us for years. Do not be fooled any longer.

Theresa also pointed out how under Esparza's DIMS system it delays the police getting back out on the street after they arrest someone as now, because of Esparza, they have to make two stops (one to Esparza's office and one to the judge) instead of only one to the judge as is true in every other county in Texas and how he has created two El Pasos. One El Paso is for his friends and connected people and one El Paso is for the rest of us. She pointed out how there are exceptions to DIMS by Esparza's very own written policies on it: Esparza and all members of his office and all public officials are NOT subject to DIMS (THEY get to go before a judge like the law mandates). Only the rest of us are subject to DIMS.

Theresa will make a wonderful District Attorney for this community. She will clean up this town. She will do away with DIMS as her first act in office. This will result in a cost saving of hundreds of thousands of dollars to the taxpayers of this community who are bleeding and will result in the re-imposition of a fair justice system in this County where all people are treated fairly and according to the law and the U.S. Constitution and not just Esparza, all his employees and public officials! That is why I am proud to support her. Please join me in voting for her on March 4, 2008!

This week you have to pay your annual property taxes by Thursday or pay a steep penalty. As you write your checks and go and wait in long lines to pay them on time remember that El Paso has the third highest property taxes in the entire state of Texas. Then ask yourself as you register the thousands paid into your check registry and see your bank account drained, what services you have received in return for this money. Do you have a well trained police force? Do you have a DA who follows the law? Do you have adequate trash pickup? Is the city clean or dirty? Are your parks maintained? Are the schools educating your children properly? Is there proper drainage for rain?

The answer to these questions for me and many El Pasoans is a resounding NO. Why?

The answer is that local politicians have been STEALING!

We now know that the Federal government through the FBI and the US Attorney's office has had to investigate and is now prosecuting high level theft by local elected officials. These officials now admit they were selling their votes to pass bonds (which make our property taxes go higher) to engorge their friends' pockets off of our backs. What did we get out of it? Nothing but higher taxes and a city that looks and runs terribly.

My opponent has watched this corruption that we pay for flourish for 16 years and he has done nothing. Absolutely nothing. Are he and other responsible local officials going to continue to act like they didn't put us in the hole a whopping $1.8 billion dollars as a community in bond and certificates of obligation debt and money for all their programs like Esparza's DIMS. DIMS does nothing but take away your constitutional rights. Our children will be paying this bill. Will they be able to buy homes to shelter their families when they grow up?

The late Sheriff Samaniego tried to get my opponent to investigate corruption cases but it just didn't happen. In the end, Sheriff Samaniego and others went to the FBI and passed the information on to them.

Esparza has no excuse or reason as to why he never convened a grand jury to investigate and why he never prosecuted the thieves. He will say, now that he is under my gun, that he "is cooperating with the FBI investigation." But what does that mean? It means he did nothing and the Feds had to take over. If Esparza is cooperating with the feds, then he must have information to share. If so, why didn't he use this information to lead his own prosecutions? Ask Esparza how much money was stolen? Ask him who stole it?

While Esparza is stumbling around those questions proving he is either incompetent or corrupt himself, entire families are being driven from their homes because they can't pay their ever rising taxes. People are having to choose between educating their children and paying their property taxes, between moving from their homes and paying their property taxes, between eating and paying their property taxes, between paying for medicine and paying their property taxes, etc. This is what we have come to.

The El Paso Times wrote an article today through the pen of Ramon Bracamontes which would have you believe that no one is talking about the corruption and the high property taxes except for me. The entire population is SCREAMING about their taxes and the corruption. Two years ago El Pasoans filed thousands of protests and untold numbers of lawsuits regarding their taxes. But they CAN'T HEAR US.-- It is interesting to note that Mr. Bracamontes never once mentioned in his article that it is my opponent's job to prosecute theft and abuse of power and how he failed to do his job and that is why the Feds are involved. But then Ramon Bracamontes' son Aaron Bracamontes was employed by my opponent. Exposing Esparza's failure to prosecute corruption might bode poorly for future employment for Bracamontes' son and other members of his family. So who cares about you and your family. Not Ramon Bracamontes and Dioicio Flores at the Times. Who cares about your need to know this information when casting your vote in hopes of better government and NOT better employment for Aaron Bracamontes and family?

Early in the race, Bracamontes called me for an interview. When I called him on the fact that his son Aaron worked for my opponent, he quickly backed out of his request for an interview and he said that someone else would be covering the race. I had caught him red handed. Now Bracamotes is back on the job, writing about my race and down playing Esparza's do nothing position regarding local corruption. Ramon Bracamontes wrote his story today as though he is neutral. Why didn't Bracamontes tell you in the article, "By the way readers, Caballero's opponent gave my son a job?" Reader beware. These are the kinds of reporters Dionicio Flores has at his newspaper. This is the kind of "ethics" they employ at that newspaper.

It brings me nothing but deep sorrow that we have such a corrupt government and a newspaper that so abuses the public trust.

I have long fought against this and other forms of corruption. If elected to be your DA I will aggressively investigate corruption and prosecute it. On top of investigating it myself, citizens will be able to report wrong doing directly to my office. I also pledge not to have the whistleblowers put in jail as my opponent has done in the past. The tax dollars you will pay to run the DA's office under me will be used to hire lawyers and accountants with the knowledge, expertise and talent to FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL.

Be sure and watch the KVIA debate tonight on my race. It starts at 6:30! Remember to vote for Theresa Caballero on March 4.

Everyone:

All the public is invited to Hanks High School tonight at 6:00 p.m. to watch Theresa Caballero and Esparza at a forum. Everyone is welcome.

Reminder: Monday, January 28, 2008 at 6:30 p.m. on Channel 7 (Cable Channel 6) tune in to watch the debate between Theresa and Esparza right before the State of the Union Address!

Stuart