Bullies and Buggers CAN be Beggars

This week on May 22, 2007, my opponent had a fundraiser. I know about this not because he invited me but because other lawyers told me. Lawyer after lawyer told me that Esparza was making personal calls inviting people to attend and/or donate. One lawyer told me that Esparza called him no less than three times about the fundraiser and the individual still didn't go. Another lawyer said that Esparza called him and he never returned the call. Yet another lawyer said that he received two invitations in the mail from Esparza and he had not paid for them. Poor Esparza can't GIVE away the tickets.


According to a friend of mine in the office, there was a "request" that the employees attend the party. An acquaintance in attendance said that there seemed to be about 100 people with 35 of them being his employees. Part of that 100 was Esparza and his wife and his indispensible personal secretary Amy Lujan, Marcos Lizarraga and his wife, etc. My question is, is Esparza making all the phone calls during work hours or is he doing the honest thing and making them before or after work hours or is he making them during work hours and taking it as time off. Is his staff working on this campaign during work hours, making calls, sending out invitations, corralling the employees to go, etc? What's your vote? Is Esparza working illegally on the campaign during work hours on the government's nickle or is he this time doing the right thing?

In any event, Mr. Esparza who could hardly acknowledge the majority of the lawyers in the court house over the last 14 years (this is a very common complaint), the same lawyers and their clients he frequently practiced legal buggery on is now having to make calls and go begging for money and support from them.

Other Updates:

This week I spoke before a citizen group regarding my campaign. The reception was very warm and the point that appears to concern this group and others is the fact that Esparza has been there too long. One comment was four terms is too much (he is on his fourth term) and five terms is way too much. Another comment is that even if he started off honest, being there so long is bound to make him corrupt. Another comment is, why did he let Joe Wardy go when he was found to have a loaded gun at the airport?

Yesterday I received a call from a radio station in Austin, Texas. They wanted to interview me regarding Chief Wiles' bid for police chief in Austin. The reporter had found this website and my blogs in a search on Wiles on the internet. I did grant them the telephone interview. In the course of the interview I talked about the police regularly killing the mentally ill due to lack of training and Chief Wiles immediately, before any meaningful investigation could take place, whitewashing the killings. I also mentioned the six courts of inquiry on his department and the fact that two cops who are currently on the force and called to testify in court (by Esparza's office) are also currently out on bond for AGGRAVATED PERJURY (that means lying under oath). I also pointed out how this would be contrary to the rules of the "matrix" (punishment grid) Wiles put into place and is toting around. Finally I talked about Chief Wiles' disdain for the role of the judge in our judicial system as evidenced by the video I have placed on the front page of this website which you can click over and watch.

The power of the internet cannot be underestimated. And it is amusing watching bullies and buggers become beggars and writing about it here for your edification and enjoyment.