Esparza in Office Too Long

On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 the message on my billboard on I-10 was changed. Changing the billboard costs money. With the help of donations I have recently received, that cost was easily covered. The first billboard which went up in February, was in blue with the logo, "Justice and Reform/Caballero for DA" and my picture. The new billboard is a fiery brick color with the Logo "IT'S TIME FOR A CHANGE/CABALLERO (D) FOR DISTRICT ATTORNEY 2008." For those readers who do not know, my opponent, Jaime Esparza, has been in office since 1993, that would be 14 very long years. On top of that, he has never been challenged. It is indeed time for a change.

Esparza ran against the sitting district attorney who had been in office 26 years. One of Esparza's unfulfilled campaign platforms was that he would seek no more than two terms. A term is four years. That promise was 14 years and four terms ago. Now that he is seeking a fifth, and the chance to be in office for 20 years, the question becomes why? Answer. "Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutley."

I spent some time talking to people yesterday about the campaign and one individual asked why I would not want to serve more than two terms if I were to be elected. He asked what I would do if I weren't finished doing the things I wanted to do at the end of a second term. I explained that one is never done working so that should never be a reason to stay. In life, there is always more to do, one more thing to see through, one more thing to touch up. What is more important is to get in, do a great job, get reform going and embedded and then bow out handing the baton to the next person. After having endured the last 14 years of the same harmful regime, it is of the utmost importance to set an example for the community so that we never again tolerate someone serving term after term going unchecked and increasing his power to the detriment of the People.

When George Washington, who was greatly loved by many different factions, reached the end of his second term, the People wanted him to run again but he said no. He was so beloved that there was even talk of making him KING. It takes a strong man to turn his back on that offer. But again he said no and to make his position on the matter abundantly clear and to point out the dangers of someone being King for life either by birth or by virtue of his just never leaving office, President Washington further stated that no man should serve more than two terms and then he stepped down and tended to his farm. This became the unwritten custom in the United States followed by every single president until Franklin Delano Roosevelt who died in his fourth term. After that, Congress, seeing the danger of someone serving term after term, then made it law that no one could serve more than two terms.

This is what we should demand of our politicians. And as we can see, my opponent's administration is an example of what happens when someone is given unbridled, unlimited, and unchallenged power. His administration has been riddled with scandal, corruption, bad judgement, poor ethics (I will be bringing you examples of this next week) a lowering of the bar for the practice of law, innocent people losing their freedom, righteous cases going uninvestigated and unprosecuted, rank and file employees at the DA's office getting salary freezes while Esparza's personal secretary, Amy Lujan, gets pay increase after pay supplement year after year and then the worst act yet, the systematic stripping down of our CONSTITUTION because Esparza thinks that that makes things "more efficient" (DIMS). We have reached the end of our road with Mr. Esparza. He has stayed too long. And the longer he stays the worse he gets and the more entitled he feels to do what he does. And entitled is what he indeed feels after all of these years in office. We are exhausted by him and tired of him. I am hearing this from the community everywhere I go, as I talk to different groups. Everyone who knows how long Esparza has been in office says, "It's time for a change" and so it was you who collectively gave me my logo for the new billboard.

Spread the word as to how long Esparza has been in office (14 years to date, 16 at the end of this term and 20 if he beats me in the election) and how we need to sweep the office clean of the bad and let good take root again. Someone might want to tell Esparza and his friends (and they have prospered under Esparza's rule) that as a nation we did away with the notion of "leaders for life" when we rose up against the king and declared our independence. Has Esparza forgotten that despite his self sense of entitlement, being District Attorney is not a hereditary TITLE and El Paso is not his private fiefdom?

Comments

Posted by scottedmunds  
on April 14, 2007, 9:53 am
When my turn came to introduce myself at a recent meeting of the El Paso ACLU, I stated that my issue is that “unbalanced unchecked power leads to unbalanced unchecked abuse”. Your blog entry more eloquently restates this universal truth. I have prepared a testimonial speech in support of your candidacy that ends with the PERFECT five word campaign slogan!

Reply to this comment
Posted by theresa  
on April 18, 2007, 6:31 am
Dear Scottedmunds,

What is the slogan so I can consider using it on my next billboard?

Reply to this comment
Posted by scottedmunds  
on April 19, 2007, 7:55 pm
The PERFECT five word campaign slogan is inspired by your quality of character that I have observed directly along with your writings and reputation as contrasted with the quality of character of your opponent Jaime Esparza.
I was in court when you and Stuart Leeds effectively defended your client Nancy Hollebeke placing Jaime Esparza in the hot seat as the real wrongdoer. It was thrilling and inspiring to see the law in action. I left a few minutes before the crowd only to encounter Mr. Esparza being interviewed on camera stating “I am not dirty”.
I observed the closing arguments in the case of Phyllis Woodall and noted that you were also in attendance. Her defense attorney Michael Gibson was convincing with the facts as contrasted with Jaime Esparza’s team that only could keep repeating that she was a horrible human being. Upon conviction she forfeited all her assets and was given sixteen years in prison. In my opinion she was guilty because she was hated by the jury and even if she did something wrong, the outcome was excessive and Jaime Esparza should be ashamed. This wasn’t justice!
The service of you and your family to society is part of El Paso lore. At one point I had an encounter with your father as mayor that was very positive.
As the independent executor of the estates of my mother and father I am unsuccessful in securing their trust documents and financial records which are necessary to resolve outstanding issues. When my father, a resident of El Paso, was stricken with throat cancer, the special interests moved in to grab the lion’s share of his estate. The growing body of evidence suggests that widespread wrongdoing is ongoing and so I filed a Police Complaint with the El Paso Police Department (EPPD) regarding “lost or stolen trust documents”. The resulting delayed Police Summary was deeply flawed and in very bad faith; specifically: 1) The Summary stated that I can’t show that my father turned the trust documents over to the Bank here in El Paso which is false because the EPPD had numbered receipts itemizing the trust documents that had been delivered to the trust department. 2) The Bank claims they lost the trust documents and end of story. One of these documents was changed after my father executed it and this “assignment to the trust” was a key component in the scheme to defraud my parents. Another “assignment to the trust” was lied about. This gave the manager of the bank’s trust department who is here in El Paso motive, means and opportunity to invade the trust and remove the documents but the EPPD never interviewed him. 3) My parents’ El Paso attorney has major inconsistencies in his story but the EPPD never interviewed him. 4) At a cost of over $165,000 I hired a National Law Firm to secure the trust documents which they never did. They assigned a lead attorney to us who was a graduate of the same ivy league school as my parents’ lead attorney and the first direction I gave to them was that I didn’t want “time limits” to expire on any wrongdoers. I was told that we would “keep everyone in the correspondence loop” which would stop the statute of limitations. As a lay person out of respect and trust in our National Law Firm I believed and subsequently acted on this as being true. Immediately when I learned that they lied to me and that “tolling” is the proper way to stop the statute of limitations and that their loyalty was to the other attorneys and special interests, I filed the Police Complaint. The EPPD refused to review any of the statute of limitation evidence proving that I had been lied to nor did they attempt to contact the National Law Firm. Instead they stated in their Summary that the Statute of Limitations had expired. 5) In fact the EPPD never interviewed anybody nor did they secure any of the trust documents. 6) The lead detective in response to my question informed me that the District Attorney (DA) oversaw every stage of the ELPD investigation. This struck me as improper as the EPPD should turn an independently completed investigation over to the DA who then exercises his Prosecutorial Discretion on how to proceed. Under Jaime Esparza the EPPD and DA are improperly blended together under the ostensibly legal structure of the DIMS. Jaime Esparza is a person who refuses to know all the facts and then makes a judgment. His loyalty is to the special interests and not to the individual citizen. 7) Initially I approached the EPPD, DA and Jaime Esparza with trust and respect but now for all of these stated reasons I feel betrayed. A week from tomorrow I’m ordered to report for jury duty and must reluctantly but truthfully inform the Court that I don’t trust nor respect the EPPD, DA and Jaime Esparza.
Theresa, before I can humbly offer your campaign a statement of support along with the PERFECT five word campaign slogan I must clarify in my own mind the answers to some questions.
1. I met with David Crowder at the El Paso Times and upon his request I provided them with a set of the evidence minus the statute of limitations evidence. He then said that they wouldn’t cover the story because it would require too much of their resources. This is understandable as the El Paso Times is part of the national corporate press where confronting powerful special interests hurts the bottom line. Is this acceptable to you?
2. I met with a representative of Congressman Silvestre Reyes who instructed that I contact the EPPD which I did. They refused to accept any of my evidence. Is this acceptable to you?
3. I met with the court coordinator for Judge Roman but the judge refused to allow me to present my pro-se affidavit. Is this acceptable to you?
4. I sent two certified letters to the American Bar Association Ethics Committee in Washington, DC but they refused to reply. Is this acceptable to you?
5. I believe that when we get to the core reason that access to my parents’ trust documents and financial records is being blocked, it is that early on an attorney crossed into wrongdoing. Subsequent attorneys and other special interests violated their fiduciary duty to my mother, father, their estates and me by switching their loyalty to the protection of the initial wrongdoer. Now this betrayal has mushroomed to engulf even the American Bar Association in Washington, DC. Your blog above correctly states: "Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutley". My case exposes that this truism applies to the legal profession which is for all practical purposes self-regulated. The vast majority of honest decent attorneys should welcome increased accountability as the proper means to weed out the miniscule number of wrongdoers. Based on the US population each citizen constitutes 1/300,000,000+ of the total. Will you enforce the protection that the US Constitution gives to each individual citizen when such action leads to increased accountability of the legal profession?
6) My sole motivation is to act in the public interest to protect the US Constitution. I’m not trying to get money from anyone nor cause trouble for anyone nor certainly get any publicity. I’m thinking of your nieces and nephew portrayed in the video above. I’m thinking of my grandsons and all of our grandchildren. I’m thinking of our posterity. I’m thinking of the sacrifices of our soldiers – look at the average age of those being killed. I’ll be 66 years old in two weeks and it is intolerable to comfortably live out my days without trying to make this a little better world for my having been here. Do you feel this way? How do you feel?


Reply to this comment


 
Name

Email

URL


Remember me?

Comments


Verification code
Verification code