Theresa Caballero's Campaign Pledges

Well here we are just a few months from the primary and I would like to recap what I stand for and how I am different from my opponent:

-I promise I will treat all the same under the law.
-I promise I will not let my friends go when they get caught with a loaded gun at the airport when I prosecute others for the same offense; See Joe Wardy case/blog.
-I promise that I will defend the Constitution and uphold its tenets at all times; See Dims blogs.
-I promise I will not set up illegal, parallel legal systems like DIMS where people are thrown in jail without going before a judge and then ask you to pay for it; See Dims blogs.
-I promise that as my first act in office I will do away with DIMS with the stroke of a pen;
-I promise that I will not hide evidence that proves that an individual is innocent; See Brandon Moon case where Esparza is being sued for this very thing as we speak.
-I promise that I will not let someone rot in prison for 17 years or even one day who is innocent; See Brandon Moon case.
-I promise that I will not throw women in jail for reporting that they have been raped by someone let alone two police officers (Jose Garcia and Albert Machorro, Jr.) and especially when one of them has a father (Albert Machorro, Sr,) who works for me; See Nancy Hollobeke case/blogs and NY Times 6-4-04.
- I promise not to fly to the other side of the state to attend a party instead of obeying a subpoenae to testify in federal court; see Esparza's trip during Nancy Hollobeke's federal civil rights trial.
-I Promise I will not jail and prosecute people who report drug corruption in the police department: See George Deangelis case/blogs;
-I promise to fiercely protect freedom of speech and not stamp it out; See Dangelis editorials and cartoons in Times regarding Esparza's vendetta prosecution and gagging of Deangelis by having him arrested for whistleblowing.
-I promise to prosecute police officers who shove nightsticks up people's rectums: See where Esparza let police go on nightstick up the rectum case reported in NY Times.
-I promise I will not abuse the grand jury; See Hollobeke and Moon cases, rectum case and hundreds of others;
-I promise I will not charge and jail someone for murder without any evidence; See William Ferguson case/blog;
- I Promise I will not use a Medical Examiner who falsifies his credentials; See Dr. Paul Shrode blog.
-I promise that if I do find out that the med examiner has falsified his credentials, I will see to it that he is immediately fired before harm to us is done instead of saying, "If you want cadilllac service you have to pay for cadillac service." See Esparza's comments to KVIA 11-13-07.
- I promise I will not fail to notify defense council of exculpatory evidence as required by Brady V. Maryland; See Dean Kinder case.
-I promise I will not lie to the People through press conferences or directly to the El Paso Northeast Demo forum about Judicial decisions; See blog on Esparza’s lying about Fed decisions on DIMS.
-I promise I will not falsely accuse people of food stamp fraud especially to collect a fee from the State; See Tampering cases and Esparza's money contract with State and his "cut."
-I promise I will maintain a healthy relationship with law enforcement so as to properly oversee their activities: See DIMS contract where Esparza collects legal fees directly from the police department thereby compromising his neutrality and prosecutor's role.
-I promise that I will prosecute all people who wrongfully attack members of the public: See where Esparza covers for police abuse perpetrated on the public.
- I promise I will not prosecute cases where law enforcement has broken into people’s homes without consent or a search warrant; See James Terrell case;
-I promise not to feign ignorance regarding corruption going on right under my nose at the court house.
- I promise I will not authorize the illegal arrest of innocent citizens; See Major Mark Bittakis case chained to a pipe at airport and jailed for 10 days for having a bag of laundry soap;
- I promise I will not bill the Federal Government for cases I am not entitled to bill on to the tune of $3-6 Million or even one cent. See recent and ongoing Federal audit of Esparza.
-I promise I will not use taxpayer/public money to augment my secretary’s salary to the tune of $45,000 to put it up to $80,000 plus, nor will I take her on out of country trips with me at taxpayer expense. See Amy Ocegueda Lujan blogs.
-I promise I will not sit on allegations of child molestation lodged against my secretary’s brother; See Albert Ocegueda case/blogs.
-I promise I will not dismiss strong DWI cases against the sons of wealthy car dealers; See Dick Poe case/blog.
-I promise I will not employ sleazy, sloppy tactics in trial to win a case and then have to retry it because I couldn’t do it right the first time; See Renteria capital muder case blog (Alejandra Flores murder) where Esparza personally tried it and his sleazy comments got the case reversed. They started picking a jury a while ago and then mysteriously stopped.
-I promise I will not use drug forfeiture money to funnel to courts thereby compromising the neutrality of the courts and the judges; See Esparza’s asset forfeiture money going to DWI courts.
- I promise I will not stay in office for more than two terms and I promise to keep that promise. See Esparza’s early broken campaign promise to stay in office only for two terms and now he is seeking a fifth. He is on his 16th year and he wants 4 more.
- I promise to establish a professionally staffed mental health unit to properly handle cases involving the mentally ill instead of simply criminalizing all of them without regard to retardation or illness as does Esparza.

I promise that I will prosecute the guilty within the parameters of the law even when the corrupt and compromised press is against me.

I promise that I will restore dignity to the District Attorney’s Office by not doing the above which my opponent has done for years and years and years.

I promise that I will continue to stand for what I have always stood for which is the law and justice even in the face of ill informed mobs being led around by the nose of an ill informed and dishonest press.

I promise to represent the People of the State of Texas with the same zeal, knowledge and preparedness as I have done for my clients as a criminal defense attorney and as I did when I was a prosecutor EVEN in the face of adversity and criticism.

I promise NEVER to back down from doing what is right whatever the pressure.

I promise that I will acquit my duties as a prosecutor and as a lawyer guided only by the law and what is right without regard to personal gain or popularity.

What do I ask of you? I ask you to look at all the horrible, cruel things that my opponent has inflicted on our community and the national embarrassment he has caused us. I ask you to weigh that against the very worst thing that a most compromised press has had to say about me and that is I have defended a woman accused of forgery who came to me and asked me to help her in my capacity as a defense attorney. See who comes up positive on the balance sheet between Esparza and me.

I ask you not to be misled or tricked by a Newspaper and its progeny TV stations that receives the bulk of its income from the City of El Paso and the politicians who run it. These are the very politicians who are afraid of my anti-corruption stance.

I ask you to use your mind and question what you hear and read from this same corrupted press. I ask you to question your government, most especially Jaime Esparza on all of the things I have listed and the many, many more I have not and the many more I do not know about it. YOU must do it because the Peter Dauts and Sito Negrons and Darren Hunts and Dionicio Flores of the world are not going to. And how do you know? Because they haven't yet.

Then I ask you to make this a better place, a place where people are not afraid of their police department or the DA’s office or the City. I ask you to make El Paso a place where people believe, and in fact it is true, that everyone is treated the same under the eyes of the law, a place where people can once again put their trust in their courts and judges.

I ask you to then go vote for me, Theresa Caballero.






Comments

Posted by justrite  
on November 16, 2007, 8:50 am
I don't know how it came to be that Ms. Quintana would choose Luis Aguilar as her attorney, but I will speculate that it was a backdoor deal. Luis Aguilar (harasser of women and an embarrassment to any court) is connected to Jaime Esparza and the EPPD. My guess is that all the people who wanted Ms. Quintana drawn and quartered will suddenly feel compassion for her as Luis Aguilar, Jaime Esparza, and Chief Wiles make a deal in the backroom to get her off easy. Suddenly the "menace to society" won't be quite so dangerous. I for one will be watching how Ms. Quintana votes in the future for any obvious changes in pattern. You would have had to REALLY defend her, this new lawyer will just make one more dirty little deal with his dirty little friends. Watch closely fellow El Pasoans, this is the "Other El Paso" Theresa mentions frequently, and yes it really does exist.

Reply to this comment
Posted by alison  
on November 16, 2007, 10:39 am
Justrite you are very insightful. My sentiments exactly. It now appears that Ms. Quintana is compromised. I don't know Ms. Quintana, but it sure doesn't appear like she's the sharpest knife in the drawer. Her constituents now have a problem.
It will be interesting to watch what Jaime Exparza does, either way, if he charges her or if he doesn't. He's going to want this to die on the back burner. All the while Ms. Quintana will be "grateful" and let's watch how she votes.

Reply to this comment
Posted by lpasopooch  
on November 16, 2007, 1:51 pm
"It now appears that Ms. Quintana is compromised. I don't know Ms. Quintana, but it sure doesn't appear like she's the sharpest knife in the drawer. Her constituents now have a problem. "

I don't know her either but I voted for her....and I have been willing to not judge. Her campaign literature was meaningful to us in many ways. If she has been compromised and her positions begin differing from her initial stands, then we do indeed have a problem in District 5. I'm not an activist by nature but I have never missed a vote. I feel certain Rachel was elected because of the sentiment regarding a number of property rights and citizen issues. I think, in Rachel's current predicament, making a deal with the devil will be attractive to her in order to spare her little girl additional stress.
For the record, I contacted my representative's (Quintana) office by email this week and made a suggestion regarding a public transportation issue close to a street in my neighborhood. I was informed, by email, that my "complaint" was forwarded to some office in the city that handles "complaints." I did not make a "complaint."
I'm not terribly happy with that effort. I made more of an effort in going out to vote.


Reply to this comment
Posted by rob  
on November 16, 2007, 1:52 pm
Alison:

You're awesome. On November 11th you were calling this "a circus" and were incredulous over the attention paid to such a minor charge. You were praising Quintana for having "the best representation" and defending her due process rights (you didn't seem to have any problems with her intelligence level at that point).

She changes counsel, and today she's "not the sharpest knife in the drawer."

Fortress mentalities and "us versus them" outlooks such as these are killing modern political discourse.

Reply to this comment
Posted by rob  
on November 16, 2007, 2:24 pm
Clearly no one here has ever heard of Occam's razor.

Perhaps Quintana didn't like having her case turned into a public sprinboard issue by her attorney. Maybe she wanted to keep a low profile. Maybe she didn't like the way she and her attorney were looking in news interviews. Maybe her and Theresa had a genuine disagreement on legal strategy.

Quintana has gone from being defended as a lone oppressed progressive voice to being vilified as a cog in the machinery and a companywomen in less than a week. Incredible.

Sadly ill-supported long reaching conspiracy theories seem to be par for the course around here.

Reply to this comment
Posted by alison  
on November 16, 2007, 5:18 pm
Rob, I've been saying that I believed this was political set up. I believed Ms. Quintana was fully aware of this and was willing to stand up and fight as evidenced by her hiring Ms. Caballero. However, Ms. Quintana has now jumped into the arms of her protagonists'. I wish life was as static as you seem to think it is. Stories evolve and Ms. Quintana's story has taken a major for the worst.
Further, obviously it was a political set up as Jaime Exparza, as of today, doesn't know if there is a case or not.

Reply to this comment
Posted by alison  
on November 16, 2007, 5:26 pm
Rob, I've been sayng that I believed this was political set up. I believed Ms. Quintana was fully aware of this and was willing to stand up and fight=as evidenced by her hiring Ms. Caballero. However, Ms. Quintana has now jumped into the arms of her protagonists. I wish life was as static as you seem to think it is. Stories evolve and Ms. Quintana's story has just taken a major turn for the worst, for now she appears compromised. Further, obviously it was a political set up as Jaime Exparza, as of today, doesn't know if there is a case or not.

Reply to this comment
Posted by justrite  
on November 17, 2007, 2:18 pm
My opinion on the Quintana issue is this: Anyone in a position of authority who can make decisions that affect other people, whether it be a manager in retail or a public official, should never, ever accept any favors, discounts, or other benefits that in any way may potentially bias their decision making. That said Ms. Quintana should never have garnered or attempted to garner a discount if she wasn't entitled to it, if that is what happened. I do believe this is an ethical issue. I do not believe it warrants the scrutiny and press attention that it has received. Forgery, come on! How will they ever prove it, one way or another? I absolutely believe it has spun way out of control and I also believe the spin was politically motivated. Having been a victim of the so-called system of justice in EL Paso I am speaking from personal experience when I speak of the unabated corruption, the monkey club mentality, and the willingness to cover for the status quo in this community. Call me a conspiracy theorist if you like, they are mere words. I know which side I stand on and it is the right side. I am not led by the nose and told what to think by anybody including Theresa. I will leave you with this thought: There are numerous people in this community who like to bash Theresa and who are vicious, ugly, and relentless in their attacks on her both personally and professionally, yet these same people never call Theresa a liar or discredit her in any way. This is because Theresa speaks the truth and they know it. Theresa, do not ever think you stand alone, there are people who do understand your passion and are not afraid of it. Do not let them bully you into submission. In this Mamby Pamby Town of Apathy you are a breath of fresh air.

Reply to this comment
Posted by rob  
on November 18, 2007, 1:06 pm
justrite:

What makes you a conspiracy theorist is the statement (without proof) that somehow the EPPD and the DA's office and Luis Aguilar are getting together to cut quintana some secret deal, and then implying that this will somehow influence future votes.

As for proving forgery, I found the arrest warrant online. The allegation is that Quintana wrote up a voucher using a pre-existing form, and then forged a supervisor's signature. In the arrest warrant, the supervisor indicates that he did not authorize the voucher. The warrant doesn't say whether each voucher is serialized, whether any anti-forging techniques are used, etc. So without looking at the actual evidence, I don't know offhand what techniques could prove or disprove that.

Reply to this comment
Posted by justrite  
on November 17, 2007, 2:59 pm
I would encourage your readers to read the article in NPT regarding Dr. Shrode, our Medical Examiner, and his lack of credentials. In it Jaime Esparza is quoted as saying that Shrode's credibility is not in question, even though he totally fabricated his qualifications on his application and resume. What don't you get, Mr. Esparza. He never had any credibility in the first place. How can Mr. Esparza even be considering charges against Quintana, yet see Shrode as somehow different? Oh yeah, Shrode must be from the "Other El Paso". Haggerty's remarks were equally inane. Veronica Escobar surprised me with her professional and reasonable statements to investigate further and her lack of willingness to be informed solely by the media. If the masses are hungry for a public hanging this is where they should be pointing their pitchforks.

Reply to this comment
Posted by rob  
on November 18, 2007, 12:35 pm
Alison:

"I wish life was as static as you seem to think it is." Very well. Thus far no charges have been filed. As of now the DA is still "investigating." Besides Quintana changing counsel, what facts have changed that has caused this case to "evolve?"

The answer of course is "nothing." You have offered up ZERO to support the assertion that Quintana is now "compromised." Not a thing. Hint: "Jumping into the arms of her protagonist" (did you perhaps mean "antagonist?") is not evidence.

Do you have some sort of inside information? Are you basing your statements on some facts that aren't public knowledge? Otherwise, it would appear that the previously mentioned assertions are based on nothing more than conjecture, hearsay, and speculation. And that, my dear, is not cause for changing one's conclusion about the facts.

Reply to this comment
Posted by rob  
on November 18, 2007, 12:53 pm
And just to cut off the inevitable "she was charged" chorus, don't confuse an arrest warrant with actually being given the green light for presecution by the DA.

Reply to this comment
Posted by justrite  
on November 18, 2007, 5:35 pm
My opinion regarding Luis Aguilar, Jaime Esparza, and the EPPD as a whole(don't call me a cop-hater, my history proves otherwise) is based on my personal experience with them. I notice that you don't dispute Theresa's allegations or justify Jaime Esparza's serious shortcomings. I think I made myself quite clear when I stated my position in regard to Ms. Quintana. Much ado about very little, and certainly not worth the taxpayer money it will cost to prove or disprove forgery. P.S. Not all of us can afford to go to college and aspire to become intellectual snobs, so please refrain from correcting my grammar.

Reply to this comment
Posted by rob  
on November 19, 2007, 12:04 pm
justrite:

And you won't see me do that either. I would no sooner attack or defend Esparza based on information from an opponent's website as I would attack or defend Theresa based on information from Esparza. It's an issue of credibility and bias.

To tell you the truth, I'm an independent who can't vote in the democratic primary and I have no idea who I will support for DA in the general election. For me it's all just talk until the party nominations are known.

Also, I wasn't correcting your grammar. I was attempting to understand your meaning. In the sentence as written, you were literally calling Esparza a hero. I trust that wasn't what you meant to say.

Reply to this comment
Posted by alison  
on November 18, 2007, 7:21 pm
Rob,
Guess who is the conspiracy theorist now? YOU!
"I wish life was as static as you seem to think it is." Very well. Thus far no charges have been filed. As of now the DA is still "investigating." Besides Quintana changing counsel, what facts have changed that has caused this case to "evolve?"

The answer of course is "nothing." Really Rob? Haven't you been reading what I've said? I'll refer you back to my comments: "I've been saying that I believed this was political set up. I believed Ms. Quintana was fully aware of this and was willing to stand up and fight as evidenced by her hiring Ms. Caballero." Now I think you can either accept what I'm saying or not. As long as Ms. Quintana had an attorney who is known to be honest and completely above board I had faith that Ms. Quintana, no matter what the disposition of the case turned out to be, could be considered a good council member. However, now that she has hired someone who doesn't hold that reputation I wonder about her future on city council will be? Now I've been watching local politics long enough to piece this all together. All this information is in the public forum. Did you not follow public access city council meetings? Or maybe, you don't know about Luis Aguilar? Or maybe you weren't paying attention during the Court of Inquiry conducted just a couple of years ago? If you were paying attention you wouldn't make such ridiculous comments. You sound a bit biased and I'm not sure if your bias is based on anything more than your dislike for Ms. Caballero. It sounds like it is you whose got a little inside information, or rather, axe to grind.

Reply to this comment
Posted by rob  
on November 19, 2007, 12:35 pm
Alison:

Can't be a conspiracy on my part as I'm convinced you have no inside access or knowledge.

I've read your posts. Your baseline assertion is because she has hired this new attorney, she wishes to deal instead of fight the charges. As proof that he is a bad guy, you posted a link where he was disciplined for basically being a chauvinist and displaying unprofessional conduct. You've convinced me! Luis Aguilar on a personal level is a bad guy! That still doesn't tell us what kind of attorney he is or how vigorous of a defense he could offer.


She hadn't yet been prosecuted previously when Theresa was representing her. As of now, still nothing. Believe it or not, many cases never actually make it to prosecution due to lack of evidence, unsustainable charges, etc.

If the charges had been dropped with Theresa as her counsel, you would have heralded this as justice being served and the innocent being vindicated. Now if the charges are dropped, you will say it's because a dirty deal was made etc etc.

As I've stated in previous blog comment, I have no opinion on Theresa.

Reply to this comment
Posted by alison  
on November 19, 2007, 2:24 pm
"Luis Aguilar on a personal level is a bad guy! That still doesn't tell us what kind of attorney he is or how vigorous of a defense he could offer." Rob, I wasn't aware the bar sanctions attorney's for being "on a personal level" "bad guys". Attorney's and judges are sanctioned in the their professional capacity as judges and attorneys. There seems to be very little that raises an eyebrow for you. Either you are the most tolerant, easy going guy, when it comes to everyone but Ms. Caballero, or there is something not clicking for you. The question is why? Why doesn't it bother you that a judge was sanctioned publicly by the very entity who oversees their professional conduct? Does nothing offend your sensibilities? That was just a morsel that I sent you. I was hoping that you would be prompted to do a little research on your own. I think it is safe to say that you don't want information, you don't want to look beyond your own nose, and you have already formed your own opinions contrary to what you have said. It was nice bantering with you but I think I save my future remarks for someone who really wants to partake in an honest give and take--which is plainfully obvious is not you. Good luck!


Reply to this comment
Posted by rob  
on November 20, 2007, 9:55 am
Alison:

I did do my own research. Before taking on Quintana, Luis Aguilar was already representing two other elected officials under FEDERAL corruption investigations. He also seems to have a history of doing this. Maybe it's because he's a former judge. Maybe he knows the ins and out of the law on these matters. I don't know. But he seems apt at doing it for one reason or another.

These things don't "connect" with me because I have experience in politics. I worked on the re-election campaign of U.S. Rep Kevin Brady (Texas 8th congressional district, College Station) in 1998 and 2000. In 2000 I was College Stations' representative to the Brazos county GOP convention. That same year I was part of Brazos county's GOP delegation to the state GOP convention in Houston. There we met the candidates and discussed policy, political intrique, etc.

All that taught me one (well, two actually) valuable lessons about politics: Politicians by and large are too self-absorbed and care too much about themselves and their own political careers to do anything that might upset that balance (the other lesson was that there is no incentive for anything productive to get done. Lingering issues become a career of ready-made campaigns).

The point of all that is thus: One occasional back room deal? Ok, I get that. Two? Perhaps. Three? Eh. But theories such as the ones you have laid out rely on an ongoing conspiracy involving EPPD, the DA's office, certain members of the city council, and assorted attorneys in private practice. My political EXPERIENCES tell me that there are too many political agendas and elected officials involved here for that to work.

Never assume malice when stupidity will suffice. That goes double for politicians.

Reply to this comment
Posted by Xnibblet  
on November 19, 2007, 5:32 pm
I would like to know more links about our city "officials" and the many grievances against them. I am sure Luis Aguilar is one of many that reports of misconduct and/or illegal actions can reveal.

In reference to the Fed Ex form allegedly signed by Quintana, I would like to know how many employees have access to this letter, and if they commonly sign it, using the supervisor name, to get discounts.

Reply to this comment
Posted by alison  
on November 20, 2007, 3:25 pm
Thank you Rob for your comments and abbreviated biography. What surprises me about your past postings, in light of your last posting, is that you have political experience. You appear to put your finger right on the problem and then you discount it, much like one does when touching something too hot. Why do you have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe what I'm saying? El Paso is a small town. Like in most places a few control local politics. Up until a decade ago it was one person. It doesn't matter how many different officials were in power the question is really how many people control the purse strings. It's almost too tedious to explain, especially to an unreceptive person. I'm sure that if you become involved in local politics, if you haven't already, you will see the connections between government many many politicians. Many people choose to move away from El Paso because it is so small. The reason I like Ms. Caballero is not only is she honest, but she doesn't play the game. If someone is on the outs it usually because they aren't playing the game. Those who are being bashed are usually the candidates you should look at supporting. If Ms. Caballero was willing to "play" her path would have been paved, with the blessings of the powers that be. Why not, she comes from an established family, she has name recognition, she's educated. Why do they dislike her so much with all that going for her? Because she was willing to take on the powers that be, even her own father. That takes guts, especially in a city like El Paso. The question you should really be asking yourself is why doesn't she have the blessing of the media, the police chief, etc... Once you anwer that question correctly you will understand El Paso politics completely.

Reply to this comment
Posted by justrite  
on November 21, 2007, 12:36 am
Rob, My remark about grammar was in defense of Alison. You may correct my grammar all you want. I won't be offended, just amused. I'm not at all sure what you are talking about in regard to my feelings about Jaime Esparza. Hero? Surely you jest! In your reply to Alison, your third and fourth paragraphs appear to be somewhat contradictory. Alison clearly understands the way it works in El Paso. Remember, we have a D.A. who has been in office for more than a decade. His office, the EPPD, numerous attorneys, and judges have been playing ball for a long time now. You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours is the same in any setting. Theresa doesn't play ball, and is vilified for it. I have not found the media's or her father's cronies opinion of Theresa to be truthful or fair to her in any way. I find Theresa to be a woman of conviction, integrity, compassion, and strength. Thanks Theresa for having the guts to fight for us even if we don't deserve it.

Reply to this comment
Posted by lpasopooch  
on November 28, 2007, 9:20 am
Since I have grown older, I have come to appreciate life in a whole different light. I was always smart. I was always active and involved and opinionated. Maybe I could have made a difference when I was young. I'll never know. Although I was exposed to some of the most courageous people in the world, I lacked courage. I was willing to stand back and admire it rather than defend it and advance it. Although I was elbow to elbow with extraordinary leadership, I never led. Too timid to take the risk of not being liked. I wish I had taken a risk. That's just part of why I admire Theresa as much as I do. I've never met her or even talked to her, but I recognize qualities of leadership in her that I think are rare. I'd like anyone who is interested, or touched by inspirational musings, to take a look at the following three minute movie and see how much of Theresa you see in it. www.theleadershipmovie.com



Reply to this comment
Posted by theresa  
on November 30, 2007, 2:21 pm
Dear Alison, Justrite and Ipaspooch,

Thank you so much for your numerous posts defending me, us and our community. This is clearly a fight against wrong and you so clearly see it despite a corrupted press and information machine.

It helps me in my fight to know that I am not alone and to hear your voices. It is more important than you can imagine.

Someone told me today to not back away. Could anyone ever believe that I would? I won't.

TC

Reply to this comment


 
Name

Email

URL


Remember me?

Comments


Verification code
Verification code